Showing posts with label Dooley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dooley. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Name change of Clara Belle (RICHARDSON) DOOLEY (1960)

source: The Republican (Danville, Indiana) - issue of Thursday, December 1, 1960 - page 10, column 5:

According to a legal notice, in December 1960, Clara Belle (Richardson) Dooley was petitioning the Hendricks County Circuit Court (case # 7714) to change her name to Patricia (Richardson) Dooley. The petition was to be heard in court on January 21, 1961.







Monday, December 12, 2016

John Edwin & Patricia DOOLEY seek to adopt baby boy (1955)

source: The Republican (Danville, Indiana) - issue of Thursday, October 13, 1955 - page 2, column 3:

According to a public notice, in October 1955, John Edwin Dooley and wife Patricia Dooley were petitioning the Hendricks County Circuit Court (case #156) to adopt a white male baby boy. The biological mother of the baby boy was identified as Julia Ann Hayslett, whose whereabouts were unknown. The petition was scheduled to be heard on November 28, 1955.




Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Danville businesses in 1888

Found among some of Hendricks County's probate records was this advertisement for some Danville businesses in 1888, with owner's last names being SHIRLEY, SHOWALTER, KEETER, SCEARCE, WILHITE, ACTON, DOOLEY, McCLELLAND, TOMLINSON, NICHOLS, SEARS and McPHETRIDGE:


Saturday, January 12, 2013

Jesse DOOLEY Seeks To Dissolve Farm Partnership (1932)

source: The Republican (Danville, Indiana) - issue of Thursday, October 27, 1932 - page 1, column 4:

ASKS RESTRAINING ORDER
A suit for the dissolution of the partnership of Jesse Dooley and Bert Dooley was filed in the circuits court during the week by Jesse Dooley. The plaintiff also asks for an accounting and restraining order against the defendant. The complaint claims that the Dooleys entered into a partnership to manage a farm in March 1931 with each sharing equal in the profits or losses. The plaintiff claims the defendant has sold produce without dividing the dividends and that she has not received any of the $750 that she gave to equip the farm. She asks for an immediate restraining order to prevent the defendant from disposing of any of the property before the court can make a settlement.